COVID

VACCINE INJURIES AS OF July 1st, 2022 1,329,135 Source: THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ORIGINS OF COVID-19 COVID UPDATE: What is the truth? April 22, 2022 The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream led by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence. Outlines of a probabilistic evaluation of possible SARS-CoV-2 origins The Evidence which Suggests that This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus A Reconstructed Historical Aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike PCR TESTING The standard testing for CoVID-19 utilizes a technology that its discoverer warned should never be used for diagnosis. This technique, known as PCR, has led to massively inaccurate and misleading conclusions. Public health authorities currently are basing societal mitigation policies and recommendations almost exclusively upon this technology by tracking putative numbers of “cases” instead of deaths and hospitalizations, and the result is an unprecedented negative impact upon society that is futile and unnecessary. It is futile in the naïve assumption that SARS CoV-2 can be contained in the population and unnecessary since deaths and hospitalizations and attendant consequences therefrom are back to pre-pandemic levels. It is imperative that tracking data upon which ongoing mitigation practices rest revert back to accurate figures for deaths and hospitalizations from CoVID-19. NO QUALIFIED VIRUS ISOLATES OF THE 2019-nCoV USE AT THE TIME THE TEST WAS DEVELOPEDKary Mullis, whose invention of the polymerase chain reaction technique earned him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 publicly stated Kary Mullis said: “Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough with PCR if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.” The Covid Test That Isn’t CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ISOLATE, THE RT-PCR TEST WAS CALIBRATED USING THE COMMON COLD. WHO Finally Admits COVID-19 PCR Test Has a ‘Problem’ The WHO’s new guidance, which includes lower PCR thresholds, almost guarantees COVID “case” numbers will automatically drop dramatically around the world. CDC FOIA Regarding the Existence of Covid-19 According to the CDC, Covid-19 has never been isolated under a microscope. MASKING Through April 2020, the official recommendation by the Journal of the American Medical Association was unambiguous. “Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.” Part of that lack of evidence in fact showed that cloth facemasks actually increased influenza-linked illness. In contravention to established science, States, municipalities, and businesses have violated the legal requirements for the promulgation of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency stating a “belief” that face masks limit the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmed that a mask prevented the transmission of or the infection by SARS CoV-2. All parties mandating the use of facemasks are not only willfully ignoring established science but are engaging in what amounts to a whole population clinical trial. This conclusion is reached by the fact that facemask use and COVID-19 incidence are being reported in scientific opinion pieces promoted by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others. New Study: Mask Mandates Associated With Increased Covid Death Rate A bombshell new medical journal report comparing Covid-19 fatality rates across Kansas counties during the height of the pandemic alleged that mask mandates could be associated with higher death rates from the virus. It’s Time to Follow the Science: Masks There’s an abundance of medical literature indicating masks are ineffective and can be harmful. See the studies. Read Scientific Evidence, Democrats! Respirators And Masks Do Not Prevent Virus Transmission As liberal democrats push ‘science,’ claiming that the country must be shut down again, schools must remain closed, and businesses must be destroyed (to the harm of the American citizen), they seem to only want to push one sort of science… the science they support COVID VACCINATION In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle: “This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…” The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot in this case. By their own admission, the mRNA gene therapy does not convey immunity, does not preclude infection by a virus, and does not block the development of COVID-19 symptoms. In point of fact, in 80% of trial participants, one or more COVID-19 symptoms was induced and recorded as adverse events. In reported RT-PCR positive cases in the general population, over 80% of individuals have no symptoms whatsoever. Therefore, not only does the injection not convey individual or community benefit (save the reported lessening of symptoms when adverse events are excluded in a subset of the population), it expressly fails to meet the public benefit argument upon which Jacobson was determined. Beyond the fact that mRNA is gene therapy technology – NOT VACCINATION – the compulsory application of an unproven medical countermeasure is without any judicial precedent. No law has been passed that